music2.jpgRecently, I watched two movies in which music was one of the main characters. Both set in the Middle-East, they give us an insight into how music can soothe the soul and go beyond conflict.

In The Band’s Visit (http://www.thebandsvisit.com/intro.html), the orchestra of an Egyptian police division is en route to give a concert in Israel, but they get lost, and this is where the story of an amazing friendship begins. It has the atmosphere of a road movie, and the sensitivity of a poem. Music seems to stand for peace in the film.

In Half-Moon (http://www.mijfilm.com/movie.php?m=71&lang=1), Mamo, the hero, is such an interesting character whose only belief is in music. The story could be a folktale featuring Mamo, his eight sons and one daughter, a motley fool and bewitching sirens. A delightful tale which ends up as magically as the rest of the film with the intervention of Half-Moon, a young singer. Music in this film is a dream… it is heaven… it stands over borders, hardships, challenges and even death!

True medicine for the soul…

battle-for-haditha.jpg On January 30th was the launch on the big screen of “Battle for Haditha” by Nick Broomfield. Incidentally, it was also his birthday, as well as my husband’s birthday (Great and charming people were born on that day including Franklin D. Roosevelt, Gene Hackman, Dick Martin, Phil Collins or Christian Bale).

I had seen the film earlier in January, and I have to say it was extremely powerful. Ambitiously narrated from three different points of view – civilians living in Haditha, insurgents and US soldiers – and putting into perspective the particular story of this event with the general political climate surrounding it, it is definitely a film to watch.

However, I had difficulties watching it to the end, because it made me physically sick, maybe I am just being too sensitive as it had been the case when I read American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis.

Just like Ellis, Broomfield shows us the dark side of events – and in fact simply the reality, as he says himself:

“The exciting thing about making documentaries is that they are about real life. They are spontaneous and out of control. As a filmmaker, you are trying to bring some sense of understanding to very out of control situations. Your ability is to record it all and make sense of it.” (http://www.channel4.com/film/reviews/feature.jsp?id=164074)

What disconcerted me was Nick Broomfield’s apparent detachment when talking about the film during the Q&A, but maybe this is simply objectivity… and it works! “Battle for Haditha” is nothing like other documentaries such as “No Man’s Land” or ”Taking Liberties” which are much more engagés.

There is, in the film, a real commitment to depict the humanity of all with equal compassion and/or equal objectivity.  Some will argue it is not quite what it comes as, but Broomfield also says that when screening the film in front of each parties all over the world, no one is quite satisfied about the angle which has been taken. Doesn’t it validate Mr Broomfield’s exercise?

“Battle for Haditha” is out in cinemas in the UK now, and will also be shown on Channel 4 later this year and released in America around April or May apparently (around the time at which soldiers involved in the massacre will be tried…)

To know more about Nick Broomfield: http://www.nickbroomfield.com

Tomorrow, I am gonna see “Half Moon”… so watch out this space :)

sanaa.jpgMinorities (I will not attempt to define this term here but that could be the topic of a coming post) is often a sensitive topic of research in the Middle East, not only because the region is a mosaic of cultures, religions and traditions, but also because governments, civil society organisations and the media are playing an important part in managing and (re)-creating these minorities.The way the media handles news about minorities is especially important because it can change the focus of information greatly.

Compare for instance an article in the Yemen Times (http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=1117&p=front&a=1) entitled “General attorney accuses security of violating constitution” with this article from the Jawa Report (http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190629.php) entitled “Religious freedom denied in Yemen”.

Can we say here that the Jawa Report is unveiling more clearly the real purpose of the Yemen Times, which because of potential future reprisals, was not able to entitle its article in the same clear manner the Jawa Report did?

Well, possibly… but what I understand from the Yemen Times article is far more complex than what the Jawa Report writes.

For instance, in the Yemen Times,

” “This has been an on going policy by the political security under the pretext of terrorism. But the latest arrest of 8 minors on Dec. 27 for lighting fire crackers is too much,” said Ali Al-Dailami, director of the Yemeni Organization for Freedoms and Rights, who participated in the protest.”

“Ahmed Saif Hashed , MP and member of the Human Rights Committee in Parliament, argued in support of the detainees. He sent a letter to Al-Olofi endorsing the case of the detainees in Hajjah who were arrested in early January 2007 on suspicion of having relatives involved with the ongoing war in Sa’ada.”

 “When the children’s relatives approached the security with enquiries about what kind of assurances they would need in order for their children to be released, they were told that they had to resist authorities in the future and cease “mischievous activities.””

To me, these statements reflect more the globalisation of human rights violations in the name of anti-terror legislation, than lack of religious freedom in Yemen per se (although it certainly is a consequence of it). And isn’t putting children to prison as important as a violation of religious freedom?

Shall we assume that both these articles report only one side of the truth? I would argue that the interaction between the facts, their context, their interpretation by the media, and how they are being received and dealt with by civil and government actors are worth analysing to get a more complete picture of events.

And that leads us to another question which will be the subject of a future post: is the politicization of minorities necessary for them to be recognised? Or does politicization end up misrepresenting them?

happy-new-year-arabic.gif

Happy New Year

I hope this year will be a fruitful and joyful year for everyone.

I am a Master student at SOAS (School of Oriental and African Studies) and I am mostly interested in the study of minorities and civil society in the Middle East and North Africa. I have wanted for a long time to share my random thoughts as I go through various readings, and this is now the perfect time for me to do so.

I simply aim through this page to provide some food for thoughts to those who are interested in this region of the world. As we know, in the realm of social sciences, arts and humanities, statements are often relative and open to questions and critiques.

Thus, these random thoughts or ‘musings’ -as I like to call them- simply represent another -probably neither completely different nor (hopefully) completely the same- view on events and research on the Middle East and North Africa.

Feedback and comments are most welcome.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.